Monday, February 27, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Photos of the Day 02/15 - The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
I love sweet dogs... I know some people who have very loving dogs ...
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Fwd: Billion
From: larry.r.trout@
Billion 'What is a Billion?
Since coming to America in 1990, I've never been unable to understand this insistence on redefining what a "billion" is, unless it's to make the national debt seem even bigger.
In England, a million is (or at least it was) a thousand squared. A billion is a million squared. A trillion is a million cubed. It's all very logical. The prefix "mono" means "one", "bi" means "two", and "tri" means "three":
one million = 1,000,000 = one million ^ 1
one billion = a million million = a million squared = one million ^ 2
one trillion = a million million million = a million cubed = one million ^ 3
In the USA, the prefix "bi" seems to be used to mean 1.5, and "tri" means 2:
one million = 1,000,000
one billion = one million ^ 1.5
one trillion = one million ^ 2
Can anyone explain the logic in this? A biplane is not an aeroplane with one and a half wings. A tricycle doesn't have two wheels. In fact it has three. And a bicycle has two wheels, not one and a half. This must be the "new math" everyone keeps talking about.
Here's one reply I got:
Oh, you English people are just silly. Since when does "tri" mean
"cubed" and "bi" mean "squared"? They mean "three of" and "two of,"
respectively, of course. By your system, a bicycle would have only one
wheel (1^2), and a tricycle would have only one wheel (1^3). It's your
English system that's all screwed up.
(I'm naturally neglecting an explanation of why a "billion" doesn't mean
"two of a million.")
:-)
So what name do you give to 1,000,000,000, if it's not a billion?
--
Barry E. Brown Internet: bbrown@sna.com
Sacramento Network Access
System Administrator/Technical Support/Engineering
Home page: http://www.sna.com/bbrown/
I know this is in good humour, but here's my semi-serious reply:
What name do you give to 1,000,000? Answer: A million
What name do you give to 7 Answer: Seven
What name do you give to 7,000,000? Answer: Seven million
What name do you give to 10 Answer: Ten
What name do you give to 10,000,000 Answer: Ten million
What name do you give to 100 Answer: A hundred
What name do you give to 100,000,000? Answer: A hundred million
What name do you give to 1,000 Answer: A thousand
What name do you give to 1,000,000,000? Answer: A thousand million
Does that answer your question? 1,000,000,000 is a thousand million.
Finally, what name do you give to 1,000,000,000,000?
Answer: A million million, which is clumsy, hence "billion" as an abbreviation for "million twice".
I still stand by my logic, although I'm told that since I left England, even the BBC has given up its standards. Oh well, that's progress, I suppose.
At least the BBC hasn't compromised yet on the fact that the third millennium begins on 1st January 2001, not on 1st January 2000 like the rest of the uneducated masses think... (Don't make me explain it :-)
Another attentive reader sent me the following excerpt from the Oxford English Dictionary:
I checked my copy of the Oxford English Dictionary, and according to their
explanation, the problem was caused by the French. Of course, we should have
suspected this.
Billion [a. F. billion, purposely formed in 16th c. to denote the
second power of a MILLION. (by substituting BI- prefix for the
initial letters), trillion and quadrillion being similarly formed to
denote its 3rd and 4th powers. The name appears not to have been
adopted in England before the end of the 17th c. Subsequently the
application of the word was changed by French arithmeticians,
figures being divided in numeration into groups of threes, instead
of sixes, so that F. billion, trillion now denote not the second and
third powers of a million, but a thousand millions and a thousand
thousand millions. Eng. retains the original and etymological use.]'
http://www.stuartcheshire.org/rants/Billion.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)